| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
ENVISAT Calibration and ValidationPresented by : Guido Levrini and Evert Attema (ESA)
CONTENTS OF THE PRESENTATION
CALIBRATION AND VALIDATION PROGRAM OBJECTIVES
Full in-flight calibration and re-characterisation of the instrument. Complete verification of the L1b processor tuning of all parameters regeneration of all L1b Auxiliary products First upgrade of the Level 1b ground processor (at end of Commissioning Phase)Routine Calibration operations starts at the end of the Commissioning Phase OBJECTIVES OF THE COMMISSIONING PHASE (2/2) VALIDATION TEAMS: Preliminary ValidationLevel 2 Algorithm verification (tuning of all processing parameters, firstregeneration of all Level 2 Auxiliary products) performed, essentially, by the ESL team carried out on the basis of the: instrument data preliminary results of some validation campaigns At end of the Commissioning Phase: the processor delivers products witha consistent geophysical behaviour By the Validation Workshop (L+9m): error bar are attached to thegeophysical products ORGANISATION: CAL/VAL TEAMSASAR Calibration & Validation team RA-2/MWR Calibration team RA-2/MWR Validation & Cross-Calibration team (CCVT) Precise Orbit Determination team (POD) MERIS Calibration team MERIS (& AATSR) Validation team (MAVT) MIPAS Calibration & Algorithm Verification team GOMOS Calibration & Algorithm Verification team SCIAMACHY Calibration & Algorithm Verification team Atmospheric Chemistry Validation team (ACVT) AATSR Calibration & Algorithm Verification team COMPOSITION OF THE CAL/VAL TEAMS Typical composition of the Calibration and of the Validation teams:ESA staff Expert Support Laboratory (ESL) members Instrument Contractor representative (Cal team) Selected AO Cal/Val Project representatives (PI) Representative of the operational processor One representative of the Val group (in the Cal team) One representative of the Cal group (in the Val team) Funding comes mostly from ESA but also from national agencies, EC, etc. Many players coordinated approach SCHEDULE
At end of the Commissioning Phase (L+6m):
ASAR IMAGE, WAVE, WS products released at end of Commissioning Phase ASAR AP, GMM products released at the Validation Workshop (L+9m) ASARInstrument calibration Antenna gain correction factor (per beam/mode) transponders Antenna pattern re-computation rain forest, module stepping Instrument drift monitoring/compensation transponders, module stepping Processor Verification and Product Quality Assessment Wave Cross-Spectra (L1b) and Wave Parameters (L2) product validation comparison with buoys and with ERS-2 data, model assimilation MERIS / AATSRVicarious calibration desert sites, clouds, rayleigh scattering over clear water, comparison with simultaneous in-situ measurements Processor Verification (Level 1b and Level 2) tuning of processing parameters re-computation of Auxiliary Products Water Products Validation open ocean cruises, coastal water sampling, fixed buoys, comparison with other sensorsValidation of Cloud parameters, Water vapour, Atmospheric corrections, Vegetation parameters via dedicated campaigns and satellite intercomparison AATSR is AO responsibility (activities are coordinated at technical level)Instrument in-flight calibration MIPAS, GOMOS, SCIAMACHYSCIA is AO responsibility (activities are coordinated at technical level) Instrument in-flight calibration (including pointing performance and re- characterisation of instrument in-flight performance)Processor Verification (Level 1b and Level 2) tuning of processing parameters re-computation of Auxiliary Products Balloons and high altitude aircraft campaigns Assimilation into models (NWP and CTM models) Intercomparison with other satellite data Ground-based measurements (lidars, FTS, spectrometers, radiometers, ozone sondes) RA-2 / MWR - PODAbsolute sigma zero calibration (via dedicated transponder) Instrument in-flight calibration (including in-flight re-characterisation of theinstrument and optimisation of the on-board tracker settings) Processor Verification (Level 1b and Level 2) tuning of processing parameters re-computation of Auxiliary Products Cross-calibration with ERS-2, Jason, T/P, GFO Product Geophysical validation and Product Quality assessment Assessment of the Quality of the operational orbit by independent expert group (POD). Computation of short-arc best fit orbits in support ofCalibration campaigns.Absolute range calibration (over NW Mediterranean basin) CONCLUSIONThe approach to the calibration of the Envisat Instruments, to theverification of the on-ground processing chains and to the validation ofthe Envisat derived geophysical quantities has been presented. The Agency is committed to deliver the Envisat data to the general usercommunity starting six months after the launch. The Calibration and Validation activities have been organised such to beable to reach this objective. The size and the complexity of the mission and the number ofgeophysical quantities to be validated represent a major challenge to allinvolved Keywords: ESA European Space Agency - Agence spatiale europeenne, observation de la terre, earth observation, satellite remote sensing, teledetection, geophysique, altimetrie, radar, chimique atmospherique, geophysics, altimetry, radar, atmospheric chemistry |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Copyright 2000 - European Space Agency. All rights reserved. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||